A Transfer from the Debtor to a Constructive Trust Isn’t a Transfer of Debtor’s Property

January 15, 2025

A Transfer from the Debtor to a Constructive Trust Isn’t a Transfer of Debtor’s Property

If there’s a constructive trust on property in the debtor’s name, the debtor was only the trustee of the constructive trust and had no legal interest in the property.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.

ABI MEMBERS ONLY

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign in using your ABI Member credentials.

Not a Member yet? Try Us Out!

Sign up to receive Rochelle's Daily Wire and try out our membership for 30 days. When you do — you'll see why our members "Think ABI First."

Learn More

Opinion Link

View Opinion

https://abi-opinions.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Snyder+v+Biros.pdf

Case Details

Case Citation

Snyder v. Biros (In re U Lock Inc.), 24-1202 (3d Cir. Jan. 9, 2025)

Case Name

Snyder v. Biros (In re U Lock Inc.)

Case Type

Court

3rd Circuit

Bankruptcy Tags

Claims

Bankruptcy Litigation

Fraudulent Transfers

Preferences

Real Estate

Comments

Submitted by Robert Bernstein on January 15, 2025

One of several related Circuit appeals that result from a contentious and litigious business separation. The bankruptcy, district, and circuit appeals are winding down (all favorably - so far - to the creditor/beneficiary. The RICO action against the debtor-side parties is still pending.

Submitted by Daniel Cohn on January 15, 2025

It isn't clear whether the constructive trust remedy depended on the corporation not yet been formed when it purported to obtain the secured loan. If that's the rationale, then I have no quarrel with the Third Circuit decision other than that this should have been made clear. But if under the law of Pennsylvania (or any state) a default in repaying a secured purchase money loan means that the collateral was held in constructive trust for the lender ab initio, then it's the same situation as when the lender gets a mortgage in a "title state" where the mortgage transfers legal title, subject to the condition that the lender reconvey the property when the secured debt is paid. Sure, the lender has title (either legal or equitable) from day one, but when foreclosure or other change in the lender's status from secured creditor to owner occurs, this constitutes a second transfer for purposes of bankruptcy avoidance powers. The Third Circuit erred in holding otherwise (or seeming to).