Lender Protected from Forced Vesting of Title; Debtors Win on Fees and Repeat Filings
Debtors notch three wins and lose once in significant consumer cases.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.
ABI MEMBERS ONLYABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign in using your ABI Member credentials.
Not a Member yet? Try Us Out!
Sign up to receive Rochelle's Daily Wire and try out our membership for 30 days. When you do — you'll see why our members "Think ABI First."
Learn MoreCase Details
Case Citation
The opinion in Judge Garrity’s case on compelling a lender to take title is In re Sherwood, 15-10637 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2016); Judge Norman’s opinion construing Harris is In re Marshall, 15-10350 (Bankr. W.D. La. Jan. 28, 2016); Judge Woodward’s Harris opinion is In re Harris, 15-12618 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. Feb. 1, 2016); and Judge Gargotta’s decision on successive chapter 13 filings is In re Klein, 15-52174 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2016).
Case Name
In re Sherwood, In re Marshall, In re Harris, In re Klein
Case Type
Consumer