Ethics And Professional Compensation Committee

Committees

Post date: Monday, December 14, 2015

After a significant amount of litigation including an appeal, remand and trial over a two-year period, the bankruptcy court overseeing In re River Road Hotel Partners LLC[1] ultimately determined that FBR Capital Markets & Co., located in Arlington, Va.

Post date: Friday, December 11, 2015

During 2015, the Ethics & Professional Compensation Committee offered three opportunities for ABI members to learn about timely and interesting ethical and compensation issues facing professionals in the bankruptcy arena.  At the Annual Spring Meeting, we paired with the Bankruptcy Litigation Committee to explore the inner-workings of “Trustee Selection in Commercial Bankruptcy Cases:  Who

Post date: Wednesday, December 09, 2015

The recent decision in Sabatini Frozen LLC v. Weinberg, Gross, & Pergament LLP[1] is a tale of a failure of corporate governance of a closely-held corporation, coupled with the failure of debtor’s counsel to adequately address that matter.

Post date: Wednesday, December 09, 2015
Photo of Marta Alfonso
Marta Alfonso

Under 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(3)(F), professionals seeking payment from a bankruptcy estate must be compensated using reasonable rates and fees charged by comparably skilled professionals in nonbankruptcy cases. Prompted by the size of the professional fees in large chapter 11 filings, the General Accounting Office (GAO) was asked by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee to evaluate whether bankruptcy professionals billed higher fees for large chapter 11 cases, and if

Post date: Wednesday, December 09, 2015

In Pham v. Golden,[1] the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) reversed an award of sanctions against the debtors and their counsel for discovery abuses in an adversary in which the debtors were not parties. In doing so, the court limited or invalidated several local rules that provided the basis for the bankruptcy court’s award of sanctions.

Post date: Wednesday, December 09, 2015

A recent decision from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California confirms what many bankruptcy attorneys have long suspected: A debtor’s bad conduct in bankruptcy may serve to defeat a fee waiver for a debtor who otherwise qualifies under the income guidelines. In In re Gjerde, the debtor, Sean Patrick Gjerde, was a disbarred

Post date: Wednesday, September 02, 2015

Bankruptcy courts are vested with the inherent and statutory authority to sanction litigants for acting in bad faith and engaging in otherwise unreasonable or inappropriate conduct.

Post date: Wednesday, September 02, 2015

In In re Halloum,[1] the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel reversed an order granting a fee expense award in excess of $116,000 based on the failure of the bankruptcy court to make supporting findings of fact.

Post date: Wednesday, September 02, 2015

On June 15, 2015, in Baker Botts LLP v. ASARCO LLC , the U.S.

Post date: Thursday, August 13, 2015

Under the recent landmark opinion ASARCO,[1] the Supreme Court noted that the bankruptcy court had awarded ASARCO’s bankruptcy counsel, Baker Botts, L.L.P.

Pages

Ms. B. Summer Chandler
Co-Chair
LSU Paul M. Hebert Law Center
Baton Rouge, LA
(404) 307-2754

Mr. Adam D. Herring
Co-Chair
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP
Atlanta, GA
(404) 322-6143

Ms. Daniela Mondragon
Communications Manager
Reed Smith LLP
Houston, TX
(713) 469-3622

Ms. Leanne McKnight Prendergast
Education Director
Pierson Ferdinand LLP
Jacksonville, FL
(904) 479-6612

Ms. Hayley J. Franklin
Newsletter Editor
Stewart Robbins Brown & Altazan
Baton Rouge, LA
(225) 571-8414

Please note that in order to view the content for the Committee Newsletters you must either sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member