In Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In re Ozenne), a majority of the U.S.
In recent years, bankruptcy judges — including the co-author of this article — have been mediating cases with more frequency. Parties in bankruptcy-related disputes often request that one of the local bankruptcy judges mediate their cases, or in other cases, that a bankruptcy judge refer a matter to a colleague for mediation.
Autonomy. Flexibility. Privacy. Cost Efficiency. Closure. These are some of the many reasons that parties choose to mediate. But once the parties agree to mediate, then what? Below are suggestions to help you maximize the value of mediation in bankruptcy cases.
A. How to Get the Most Out of Your Mediation
We asked our joint membership to respond to mediation-related survey questions in order to better understand the experience and to receive comments from the litigant’s and mediator’s perspectives. We would like to thank all those who responded to the survey. We received a robust response and are providing highlights to our joint membership.
This article by C. Edward Dobbs provides a detailed outline for party advocates and mediators.
In June 2015, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decided In re Alternate Fuels Inc., clarifying its position on debt-equity recharacterization in light of two Supreme Court decisions and further entrenching a circuit split on recharacterization analysis.
Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code expressly subordinates claims arising from the purchase or sale of a security in the debtor or an affiliate to the level of equity. It thus functions as a form of recharacterization. Despite its broad scope, § 510(b) is relatively underused, making it a potentially powerful tool for creative debtors, committees and trustees.
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
Holland & Knight LLP
Membership Relations Director
Ice Miller LLP