Salary Paid by a Ponzi-Schemer Isn’t Necessarily a Fraudulent Transfer, Circuit Says

August 26, 2022

Salary Paid by a Ponzi-Schemer Isn’t Necessarily a Fraudulent Transfer, Circuit Says

The Tenth Circuit dealt with the thorny question of which expenses paid by a Ponzi-schemer are fraudulent transfers.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.

ABI MEMBERS ONLY

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign in using your ABI Member credentials.

Not a Member yet? Try Us Out!

Sign up to receive Rochelle's Daily Wire and try out our membership for 30 days. When you do — you'll see why our members "Think ABI First."

Learn More

Opinion Link

View Opinion

https://abi-opinions.s3.amazonaws.com/Desert+Hill+Ventuers.pdf

Case Details

Case Citation

Georgelas v. Desert Hill Venture Inc., 21-4036 (10th Cir. Aug. 22, 2022)

Case Name

Georgelas v. Desert Hill Venture Inc.

Case Type

Court

10th Circuit

Bankruptcy Tags

Fraudulent Transfers